Везде
Comparative Methodology for the Formation of Legal Models
Table of contents
Abstract Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Comparative Methodology for the Formation of Legal Models
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
DOI
10.61205/jzsp.2023.077
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Aleksey V. Egorov 
Occupation: Rector, Belarus State Economic University; Member of the Standing Committee on Legislation, House of Representatives, National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus
Affiliation:
Belarus State Economic University
House of Representatives, National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus
Address: Minsk, Belarus
Edition
Volume 19 No. 6
Pages
13-25
Abstract

Legal modeling is an important area of modern scientific research. The potential of activities for the formation and introduction of legal models into the national environment may be improved when the methods of comparative law are used extensively. The external reserves for the reformation and modification of modern legal systems are searched for with the help of comparative legal tools including legal reception.

The purpose of the study is to determine the main comparative approaches in the implementation of legal modeling. For this purpose, the main methodological rules for using comparative law for the formation and adaptation to new social conditions of legal models based on the study of foreign legal experience are considered.

The main method of research is a comparative analysis of the components of legal reality emerging and functioning in different social conditions.

The results of study. It is necessary to distinguish between the comparative knowledge of foreign legal matter studied by comparative (descriptive) law and the theory of legal comparative studies itself (general theory of law) that is a meta-theory of modern legal science aimed at ensuring macro-level interaction of national legal systems. The basic for modeling and reception of legal objects of foreign origin is the legal family doctrine structured in the «trichotomy» of Romano-Germanic, Anglo-Saxon and religious-communal law. The theoretical and methodological components of this formal legal unity of legal systems are the main legal markers. There are the sources and system of law, the characteristics of the legal norm and the legal concepts. The methodology of legal comparative studies used at the subject, object and instrumental levels of legal modeling are consistently described in the article.

Keywords
legal model, modeling, comparative jurisprudence, legal reception, legal family, national legal system
Date of publication
11.12.2023
Number of purchasers
7
Views
66
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Allensworth R. H. Law and the Art of Modeling: Are Models Facts? The Georgetown Law Journal, 2015, vol. 103. 
2. Ashley K. D. Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. Cambridge, 1991. 
3. Bourcier D. Sciences juridiques et complexité. Un nouveau modèle d’analyse. Droit et cultures, 2011, iss. 1. 
4. Cruz P. Modern Approach to Comparative Law. Boston, 1993. 
5. Madachy R. System Dynamics Structures for Modeling Lawmaking Processes. The Science of Laws Journal, 2017, vol. 3, iss. 1. 
6. Balashenko S. A. Legal modeling as a method of law-making activity. Vesnіk Belaruskaga dzyarzhaȳnaga ȳniversiteta. Seryya 3: Gіstoryya. Ekanomіka. Prava, 2015, no. 3, pp. 94—97. (In Russ.) 
7. Vasilevich G. A. Constitutional justice. Minsk, 2014. (In Russ.) 
8. Helvetius K. A. About the mind. Moscow, 1938. (In Russ.) 
9. Golubtsov V. G., Valeev D. H. Legal modeling as a method of civil research. Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh issledovaniy, 2021, iss. 3. (In Russ.) 
10. David R. Basic legal systems of modernity. Moscow, 1997. 
11. Egorova A. G. Foreign element in national law. Minsk, 2002. (In Russ.) 
12. Inshakova A. I. Comparative analysis of Russian and German legislation on joint-stock companies. Saratov, 2001. (In Russ.) 
13. Carbonnier J. Legal Sociology. Moscow, 1986. (In Russ.) 
14. Krasheninnikova N. A. Legal culture of Modern India: Innovative and Traditional features. Moscow, 2009. (In Russ.) 
15. Marchenko M. N. Theory of state and law of Russia. Vol. 2. Moscow, 2019. (In Russ.) 
16. Saidov A. H. Introduction to Comparative Jurisprudence. Moscow, 1988. (In Russ.) 
17. Salygin E. N. Modeling in law: problems and prospects. Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2013, no. 3. (In Russ.) 
18. Syrodoeva O. N. Joint stock law of the USA and Russia: (Comparftive analysis). Moscow, 1996. (In Russ.) 
19. Tikhomirov Y. A. Course of Comparative Jurisprudence. Moscow, 1996. (In Russ.) 
20. Zweigert K., Ketz H. Introduction to Comparative Law in the field of private law: Fundamentals. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2000. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate