Везде
Evolution of the Judiciary in the Information Society
Table of contents
Abstract Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Evolution of the Judiciary in the Information Society
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
DOI
10.61205/jzsp.2023.068
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Khanlar Gadjiev 
ORCID: 0000-0001-6002-6075
Occupation: Chief Researcher, Center of Judicial Law
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Elena Povorova
Occupation: Deputy Editor-in-Chief
Affiliation: Editorial Office of the Magazine “Russian Justice”
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 19 No. 5
Pages
79-91
Abstract

Social interaction is changing as a result of technological evolution. The judiciary, which is closest to society, reacts sensitively to all changes in the conditions and forms of working with information. The judges are responsible not only for establishing a fair balance between all factors that are important for the effectiveness of the entire legal system but also for protecting the legitimate expectations of citizens as the basis of public confidence in the judiciary. The ongoing modernisation of justice takes into account the possibilities of technology in terms of optimising routine actions and at the same time strengthens the law enforcement and law-making potential of all judicial functions. Judicial policy in the information society prioritises the formation of a positive image of the judiciary.

Modern media give the judiciary more control over the way they convey information to their recipients, and now it is not important for law enforcement officers how the media can be useful, but what they are able to say to the public.

The use of judicial doctrines, including the argumentation of judicial acts, serves the development of judicial law and reveals in a new way the potential of the legal influence of courts on the information society. The judicial acts formulate legal doctrines that are capable of forming not only models of legal behaviour but also influencing the legal consciousness of society as a whole. The media participate in the formation of the legal landscape of public power and influence the formation and satisfaction of the request of civil society to receive meaningful information on judicial issues affecting the life of society and its ideas about the fairness and legality of the courts. The judicial system is changing the models of interaction with society in parallel with the change in the internal organisation of information flow management, which turns out to be involved in mediatisation. The evolution of the judiciary is closely related to the media space, where the judiciary publishes its judgements, statistical data, and information about the activities of judicial bodies, and is also involved in the general mediatisation, which affects the entire social reality with its public institutions and civil society.

Keywords
judiciary, information technologies, digitalisation of justice, judicial practice, mediatisation, information policy, publicity of the judicial process, artificial intelligence, information society
Date of publication
26.10.2023
Number of purchasers
10
Views
178
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Bigelow R. P. Your Computer and the Law. Prentice Hall, 1975. 283 p. 
2. Binns J. The impact of social media on the criminal justice system. Available at: https: //www. mondaq. com/uk/social-media/794406/ the-impact-of-social-media-on-criminal-justice-system (accessed 27. 03. 2023). 
3. Canivet G. The Interrelationship Between Common Law and Civil Law. Louisiana Law Review, 2003, vol. 63, no. 4. 
4. Couldry N., Hepp A. The Mediated Construction of Reality. Cambridge, 2016. 256 p. 
5. Del Mar M. Artefacts of Legal Inquiry: The Value of Imagination in Adjudication. Oxford, 2020. 504. 
6. Kirby M. The Future of Courts — Do They Have One? Journal of Law, Information and Science, 1998, vol. 9, no. 2. 
7. Peleg A., Bogoch B. Removing Justitia’s blindfold: the mediatization of law in Israel. Media, Culture, Society, 2012, vol. 34, iss. 8, pp. 961—978. 
8. Pollicino O., Paolucci F. Digital Constitutionalism to the Test of the Smart Identity. Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, 2022, vol. 18, no. 3. 
9. Pollicino O. Transatlantic Dimension of the Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights Online. The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law, 2021, vol. 1, iss. 2, pp. 8—21. 
10. Robbennolt K. J., Studebaker A. Ch. News Media Reporting on Civil Litigation and its Influence on Civil Justice Decision Making. Law and Human Behavior, 2003, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1—23. 
11. Schulz W. Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication, 2004, vol. 19, iss. 1. 
12. Stonebridge H. The Judicial Imagination: Writing after Nuremberg. Edinburgh, 2011. 178 p. 
13. Susskind R. Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Available at: https: //www. researchgate. net/publication/350408712_Online_ Courts_and_the_Future_of_Justice (accessed 27. 03. 2023). 
14. Annenkova I. V., Pilgun M. A., Chernogor N. N. Mediatization in Legal Sphere: Problem Statement. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 10, pp. 5—14. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/art_2018_10_1. 
15. Baymoldina Z. Kh. (ed. ). Human Rights and the Judiciary in the Information Society: Issues of Theory, Practice and Legislation: Collection of materials of the III Eurasian Society for Human Rights. Nur-Sultan, 2022. 226 p. (In Russ. ) 
16. Bondar N. S. Judicial Jurisprudence — From Digesta Iustiniani to the Modern General Law Category. Rossiyskaya yustitsiya, 2022, no. 12, pp. 17—29. (In Russ. ) 
17. Bondar N. S., Dzhagaryan A. A. Justice: orientation to the Constitution. Moscow, 2022. 224 p. (In Russ. ) 
18. Volodenkov S. V. Mediatization and Virtualization of the Modern Space of Political Communications: Features and Trends. In: Collection of materials of the XI International scientific-practical Chicherin Conference “Russia in the 2016—2018 election cycle. Goals. Meanings. Events”. Tambov, 2017. Pp. 25—50. (In Russ. ) 
19. Hajiyev Kh. I. Judicial Doctrines and Efficiency of Law Enforcement. Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 6, pp. 14—27. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/jrl. 2019. 6. 2. 
20. Kovler A. I. Anthropology of Human Rights in the Digital Age (the Essay of the Comparative Legal Method). Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 5—29. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/jrl. 2022. 125. 
21. Kortens G. Courts and the Rule of Law: A View from the Netherlands. Moscow, 2021. 283 p. (In Russ. ) 
22. Laptev V. A. Deepfake and other Artificial Inntelligence Products on the Way to the Development of Online Justice. Actual Problems of Russian Law, 2021, no. 11, pp. 180—186. (In Russ. ) 
23. Lebedev V. M. Formation and development of the judiciary in the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2000. 368 p. (In Russ. )
24. Momotov V. V. Justice in the Digital Age. Sud’ya, 2019, no. 2, pp. 6—9. (In Russ. ) 
25. Momotov V. V. Justice and Expediency in the Anglo-American and Continental European Legal Systems: Statement of the Problem. Rossijskoe pravosudie, 2017, no. 12, pp. 16—24. (In Russ. ) 
26. Momotov V. V. Respect for the Sourt as a Legal Category: Reality and Prospects in Russia. Sud’ya, 2019, no. 4. (In Russ. ) 
27. Nim E. G. (Un)social Construction of Reality in the Era of Mediatization. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie, 2017, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 409—427. (In Russ. ) 
28. Opaleva A. A., Metsger A. A. Accessibility and Efficiency of Justice as an Important Condition for the Protection of Human Rights and Freedoms in Russia. Obrazovanie. Nauka. Nauchnye kadry, 2020, no. 4, pp. 145—149. (In Russ. ) 
29. Sklyarenko M. V. Effective Enforcement of Judgments is a Basic Criterion for the Efficiency of Justice. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii, 2014, no. 6, pp. 146—152. (In Russ. ) 
30. Khabrieva T. Y. Technological Imperatives of the Modern World and the Role of Law. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2023, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 5—12. (In Russ. ) DOI: 10. 12737/jzsp. 2023. 001. 
31. Khayek F. Law, Legislation And Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy. Chelyabinsk, 2020. (In Russ. ) 32. Kharitonova Yu. S., Savina V. S., Panini F. Artificial Intelligence’s Algorithmic Bias: Ethical and Legal Issues. Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, 2021, iss. 53, pp. 488—515. (In Russ. ) 
33. Tikhomirov Yu. A., Nanba S. B. (eds). Legal Concept of Robotization. Moscow, 2019. (In Russ. )

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate