Везде
Human Rights Protection in the Practice of the EU Court of Justice: from the Origins to the Present
Table of contents
Abstract Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Human Rights Protection in the Practice of the EU Court of Justice: from the Origins to the Present
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
DOI
10.61205/jzsp.2023.056
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Iana Lebedeva 
ORCID: 0000-0002-2982-5642
Occupation: Researcher
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 19 No. 4
Pages
120-131
Abstract

The relevance of present study is due to the withdrawal of the Russian Federation from the European system of human rights protection, which creates the need to search for other models of external control over the observance of human rights. One of them is the protection of human rights by integration justice bodies. Despite the fact that integration in the Eurasian Economic Union is purely economic in nature, the experience of integration associations shows that even with such a paradigm, the protection of fundamental human rights can still be carried out. The advantage in this regard is the gradual formation of the human rights catalogue. The experience of the European Union shows that even without a regulatory framework similar to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, it is possible to ensure effective protection of rights and freedoms in the practice of the integration justice body. The legal analysis in this study begins with the period of the 1970s, when the EU Court determined the main features of the supranational system of human rights protection. In the 1980s and 1990s, the Court gradually expanded the range of protected rights. At the turn of the epochs, the human rights approaches of the EU Court were summarized in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in 2000. The author of the article examines the first precedents considered after the latter was given the status of the primary source of law. In conclusion, an analysis is given of recent decisions in the Melloni and M. A. S. cases, in which the EU Court formulated a very ambiguous approach regarding the scope of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Keywords
integration law, European Union, Court of Justice of the European Union, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, human rights, constitutional law, constitutional traditions
Date of publication
11.09.2023
Number of purchasers
12
Views
93
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Besselink L. The Parameters of Constitutional Conflict after Melloni. European Law Review, 2014, vol. 39, iss. 4, pp. 531-552.
2. Claes M. The National Courtsʼ Mandate in the European Constitution. Oxford, 2006. 818 p.
3. Fichera M., Pollicino O. The Dialectics Between Constitutional Identity and Common Constitutional Traditions: Which Language for Cooperative Constitutionalism in Europe? German Law Journal, 2019, iss. 8, pp. 1097—1118.
4. Kosta V., de Witte B. Human rights norms in the Court of Justice of the European Union. Human rights norms in ʽotherʼ international courts. Ed. by M. Scheinin. Cambridge, 2019. Pp. 263—268.
5. Vasileva T. A. The Court of Justice of the EU and Constitutional Courts of EU Member States in Search of Constitutional Identity. Trudy Instituta gosudarstva i prava Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 2019, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 32—58. (In Russ.)
6. Hajiyev Kh. I. Judicial Legislation in International Justice. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2018, no. 3, pp. 118—129. (In Russ.)
7. Ispolinov A. S. In search of a new paradigm: the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights three years after Opinion No. 2/13. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, 2018, no. 2, pp. 16—27. (In Russ.)
8. Ispolinov A. S. Second Veto of the Court of Justice of the European Union on the Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, 2015, no. 1, pp. 118—134. (In Russ.)
9. Kapustin A. Ya., Kovler A. I., Belyalova A. M., Lebedeva Ya. I., Fokin E. A. Inter-State Applications in International Courts: History and Prospects. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2020, no. 6, pp. 116—134. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2020.056.
10. Kovler A. I., Lebedeva Ya. I. Protection of Human Rights stricto sensu by the Courts of Integration Associations: Experience of Comparative Analysis. Mezhdunarodnoe pravosudie, 2022, no. 4(44), pp. 36—50. (In Russ.)
11. Lebedeva I. I. EU Values: Concept, Legal Nature and Impact on the Constitutional Law of Sovereign States. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2022, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 130—147. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2022.029.
12. Khabrieva T. Y., Kovler A. I. (eds). International Justice as a Factor of Integration. Moscow, 2019. 192 p. (In Russ.)
13. Ryabova V. O. The interaction of the Court of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights on Affairs for the Protection of Human Rights after the Lisbon Treaty. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2016. 188 p. (In Russ.)
14. Ryabova V. O. European Union Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights: Problems and Perspectives. Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskiy region: ekonomika, politika, pravo, 2015, no. 1, pp. 172—185. (In Russ.)
15. Entin K. V. The Accession of the European Union to the ECHR. Moskovskiy zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava, 2012, no. 3, pp. 108—124. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate