Везде
Comparative Legal Elements of the Criminal Law Transformation for the Protection of Digital Relations
Table of contents
Abstract Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Comparative Legal Elements of the Criminal Law Transformation for the Protection of Digital Relations
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
DOI
10.12737/jzsp.2023.019
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Oleg Zaytsev 
ORCID: 0000-0002-8706-903X
Occupation: Chief Researcher, Center of Criminal, Criminal Procedure Legislation and Judicial Practice
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Yaroslava Kuchina
ORCID: 0000-0003-1681-1038
Occupation: Doctoral Candidate and Research Assistant
Affiliation: University of Macau
Address: Macau, China
Edition
Volume 19 No. 2
Pages
21-31
Abstract

The popularity of comparative legal research in criminal law, especially in the field of digital relations and their protection, is extremely high. Insufficient national law enforcement experience related to information technologies is often compensated by analyzing the experience of foreign countries. In this regard, there is a need to develop new approaches to understanding the comparative analysis of the law governing digital and non-digital relations.

The purpose of the study is to consider this problem through the prism of technology as an object of protection, and not through the need to improve criminal law regulation. Such a change in the angle of view will reveal other problems than with the traditional approach to comparative legal analysis in criminal law.

The methodological basis of the research was the dialectical method of cognition, general scientific methods of abstraction, analysis and synthesis, as well as special legal methods (comparative legal, logical legal, etc.).

Conclusions: when conducting a comparative legal analysis in criminal law, in order to protect digital relations, it is necessary to rely on a larger number of features of the digital market that require study. The beginning of a comparative legal study of criminal legislation in the field of digital relations should be not only the object of the crime, but also what it is formed around. At the same time, it is recommended to pay attention to a number of aspects that are usually not affected by comparative legal studies in criminal law.

Keywords
digitalization, digital relations, criminal law, comparative legal analysis
Date of publication
17.05.2023
Number of purchasers
12
Views
129
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1.	Abu-Taieh E. et al. Cyber Security Crime and Punishment: Comparative Study of the Laws of Jordan, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, and Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Cyber Warfare and Terrorism (IJCWT), 2018, vol. 8, no. 3.
2.	Albarrak M. S., Alokley S. A. FinTech: Ecosystem, Opportunities and Challenges in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 2021, vol. 14, no. 10.
3.	Bavula Yu. N. Analysis of the current concept of artificial intelligence and its current state. Sovremennye nauchnye issledovaniya i razrabotki, 2018, no. 10(27), pp. 141—142. (In Russ.)
4.	Berezkova A. I., Pavlenko I. P. Legal regulation of unmanned apparatus in Russia. In Loginov Yu. Yu. (ed.). Materials of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference dedicated to the Day of Cosmonautics. Krasnoyarsk, 2020. Pp. 679—680. (In Russ.)
5.	Buckley R. P., Webster S. FinTech in Developing Countries: Charting New Customer Journeys. Journal of Financial Transformation, 2016, vol. 44.
6.	Bukin D. V. On the way to a universal convention on combating information crime. Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn’, 2022, no. 7, pp. 20—23. (In Russ.)
7.	Castellani L. G. The Role of UNCITRAL Texts in Promoting a Harmonized Legal Framework for Cross-Border Mobile Payments. Washington Journal of Law, Technology and Arts, 2013, vol. 8, no. 3.
8.	Chernogor N. N. Artificial Intelligence and Its Role in the Transformation of Modern Law and Order. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 5—15. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.037.
9.	Danelyan A. A. International legal regulation of cyberspace. Obrazovanie i pravo, 2020, no. 1, pp. 261—269. (In Russ.)
10.	Dremlyuga R. I. Computer information as an target for illegal access: comparative analysis of the USA and Russian legislation. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2018, no. 6, pp. 129—133. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art.2018.6.14.
11.	Gabdulov I. N. Definition of the concept of artificial intelligence. Alleya nauki, 2019, vol. 1, no. 9(36), pp. 173—176. (In Russ.)
12.	Golovanova N. A., Gravina A. A., Zaytsev O. A. et al. Jurisdictional lawful activities within the criminal law sphere framework in the context of digitalization. Moscow, 2019. 212 p. (In Russ.)
13.	Gorelik I. B. International legal counteraction to cybercrime: the process of formation and management problems. Vestnik diplomaticheskoy akademii MID Rossii. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo, 2021, no. 1(12), pp. 87—104. (In Russ.)
14.	Jilkine V. A. Digital technologies and the application of artificial intelligence in finland and in Russia: comparative legal research. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2018, no. 6, pp. 74—78. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/art.2018.6.5.
15.	Khabrieva T. Y. Law Facing the Challenges of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 9, pp. 5—16. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_9_1.
16.	Khabrieva T. Y., Chernogor N. N. The Law in the Conditions of Digital Reality. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 1, pp. 85—102. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_1_7.
17.	Kucherov I. I., Sinitsyn S. A. (eds). Digital Economy: Current Directions of Legal Regulation. Moscow, 2022. 376 p. (In Russ.)
18.	Kuchina Ya. O. Cryptocurrency turnover as an object of crime and doctrinal errors in its perception. Aktual’nye problemy rossiyskogo prava, 2020, vol. 15, no. 4(113), pp. 118—127. (In Russ.)
19.	Kuchina Ya. O. Legal regulation of cloud computing. Moscow, 2018. 172 p. (In Russ.)
20.	Lehman-Wilzig S. N. Frankenstein unbound: Towards a legal definition of artificial intelligence. Futures, 1981, vol. 13, no. 6.
21.	Mohan D. How banks and FinTech startups are partnering for faster innovation. Journal of Digital Banking, 2016, vol. 1, no. 1.
22.	Morhat P. M. Iskusstvennyy intellekt: pravovoy vzglyad. Moscow, 2017.
23.	Naumov A. V. On the Specifics of the Content and Orientation of the Comparative Legal Method of the Science of Criminal Law in Modern Conditions. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2022, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 30—36. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2022.046.
24.	Nudel S. L. Modernization of Criminal Policy: Problems of Legal Regulation. Journal of Russian Law, 2023, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 5—22. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrp.2023.001.
25.	Omarova S. T. Dealing with Disruption: Emerging Approaches to Fintech Regulation. Washington University Journal of Law and Policy, 2020, vol. 61.
26.	Osipov G. S. Metody iskusstvennogo intellekta. Moscow, 2011.
27.	Semykina O. I., Klyuchko R. N. “Digital” Element of Crimes as Vector of Criminalization (Comparative Review of Approaches of CIS Member States). Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2020, no. 6, pp. 34—52. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2020.051.
28.	Shafqat N., Masood A. Comparative Analysis of Various National Cyber Security Strategies. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 2016, vol. 14, no. 1.
29.	Stronskiy D. D., Shuvalova V. O. International legal regulation of internet-space. Ekonomika. Pravo. Pechat’. Vestnik KSEI, 2018, no. 4(80), pp. 107—110. (In Russ.)
30.	Talapina E. V. Law and Digitalization: New Challenges and Prospects. Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 2, pp. 5—17. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_2_1.
31.	Tikhomirov Yu. A. State-Legal Regulation: Grounds and Limits. Journal of Russian Law, 2017, no. 9, pp. 5—16. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/article_599d7441d27ed3.95243402.
32.	Tikhomirov Yu. A., Pulyaeva E. V., Khludeneva N. I. (eds). Legal space and a person. Moscow, 2012. 240 p. (In Russ.)
33.	Toygar A., Rohm Jr. C. E., Zhu J. A New Asset Type: Digital Assets. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 2013, vol. 22, no. 4.
34.	Trofimtseva S. Yu. Organization of countering to cybercrime: A comparative analysis of procedural recommendations of the Budapest Convention and CIS law. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2020, no. 11(150), pp. 245—247. (In Russ.)
35.	Trofimtseva S. Yu. Prohibition for unauthorized access to computer information in foreign law as a legal measure against cybercrime. Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal, 2019, no. 8(135), pp. 335—337. (In Russ.)
36.	Wang P. On defining artificial intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 2019, vol. 10, no. 2.
37.	Zaytsev O. A., Pechegin D. A. Ensuring cryptosecurity by criminal law means: the experience of foreign countries. In Titova E. V. (ed.). University legal dialogues “Law of the digital environment”: materials of the International scientific-practical conference, March 27—28, 2020. Chelyabinsk, 2020. 390 p. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate