Везде
Transformation of the State Jurisdictional Immunity in a Comparative Legal Context
Table of contents
Abstract Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Transformation of the State Jurisdictional Immunity in a Comparative Legal Context
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
DOI
10.61205/S199132220031263-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Kirill Naletov 
Occupation: Leading Researcher, Center of International Law and Comparative Law Studies
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 20 No. 4
Pages
102-113
Abstract

This article is dedicated to problematic issues of jurisdictional immunity, developing from the total liberation of foreign states from the jurisdiction of courts of other foreign states (the doctrine of absolute jurisdictional immunity) to a purely functional understanding of the activities of a modern foreign state, expressed in the concept of functional jurisdictional immunity and in an expansive approach to interpreting the actions of a state as a waiver of jurisdictional immunity and understanding its behavior in as consent to the jurisdiction of a court of a foreign State. The article examines the provisions of the norms of international treaties on the jurisdictional immunities of foreign states, acts of national law (in particular, the US Act on the Immunity of a Foreign Sovereign and the provisions of the Russian federal law on the jurisdictional immunities of foreign states and their property. The article considers the problems of identifying the defendant as a foreign state, the bearer of sovereign authority iure imperii, the problem of the criterion for distinguishing the actions of iure imperii and iure gestionis, the problem of understanding the principle of reciprocity and the problem of improper defendant for the actions of states not recognized by Russia. The article analyzes two international treaties — the 1972 European Convention on State Immunity and the UN Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their Property, which are not international treaties of the Russian Federation, but are full-fledged instruments for the formation of norms of international law and national legislation. According to the author of this article, the list of “conclusive” actions of a foreign state indicating its consent to the jurisdiction of a foreign state is open.

Keywords
jurisdictional immunity, sovereignty, foreign state, actions of an authoritative nature, actions of iure gestionis, commercial transactions, the principle of reciprocity, implied waiver of immunity, state consent to the jurisdiction of a foreign court
Date of publication
29.08.2024
Number of purchasers
3
Views
50
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Dicey A. V. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 10th ed. London; New York, 1885 [1959]. 
2. Gaukrodger D. Foreign State Immunity and Foreign Government Controlled Investors. OECD, 2010. DOI: 10.1787/5km91p0ksqs7-en. 
3. Loughlin M. The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford, 2013. 
4. Berg L. A. The subsequent practice of applying international treaties as a means of their interpretation. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo, 2023, no. 4. (In Russ.) 
5. Wolfgang Graf Vitzthum et al. Völkerrecht. Transl. from German. Moscow; Berlin, 2011. (In Russ.) 
6. Ezhukova O. A. Territories of a special public-law regime as a factor of Russian federative policy. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo, 2021, no. 3. (In Russ.) 
7. Zatonskiy V. A. An effective statehood. Ed. by A. V. Malko. Moscow, 2006. (In Russ.) 
8. Kanashevskiy V. A. Private international law. Moscow, 2006. (In Russ.) 
9. Krylov S. B. Private international law. Leningrad, 1930. (In Russ.) 
10. Kutafin O. E. Russian Federation, its subjects and munici pal formations as subjects of civil law. Journal of Russian Law, 2007, no. 1, pp. 46—54. (In Russ.) 
11. Lukashuk I. I. Modern law of international treaties. Vol. 2. Moscow, 2006. (In Russ.) 
12. Mekhtiev M. G. Protection of Social and Economic Rights in Conditions of Integration. Journal of Russian Law, 2024, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 136—151. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.61205/jrp.2024.2.6. 
13. Mekhtiev M. G. On the Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court on the European Central Bank’s Public Sector Purchase Program. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2020, no. 4, pp. 134—138. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/ jflcl.2020.036. 
14. Lazarev V. V. (ed.). General theory of law and state. Moscow, 1994. (In Russ.) 
15. Pyatkov D. V. Participation of the Russian Federation, it’s regions and municipalities in private law relations: on the example of delimitating public property. St. Petersburg, 2003. (In Russ.) 
16. Samsonov N. V. The evolution of judicial immunity of a foreign sovereign in Russian civil procedure. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2023, no. 4. (In Russ.) 
17. Kapustin A. Ya. (ed.). Modern concept of interpretation of international treaties. Moscow, 2022. (In Russ.) 
18. Sokolova R. I., Spiridonova V. I. State in modern word. Moscow, 2003. (In Russ.) 
19. Fukuyama F. State Building Governance and World Order in the Twenty-First Century. Transl. from English. Moscow, 2006. (In Russ.) 
20. Khlestova I. O. Russian legislation on foreign state immunity: tendencies of development. Journal of Russian Law, 2004, no. 7, pp. 105—115. (In Russ.) 
21. Chirkin V. E. Juridical person of public law. Journal of Russian Law, 2005, no. 5, pp. 16—26. (In Russ.)
22. Shulyatyev I. A., Mekhtiev M. G. Review of the BRICS+ International Legal Conference “Developing Countries and the Development of International Law”. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2023, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 138—143. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.61205/jzsp.2023.074.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate