Везде
The Category of Objects of Civil Rights in the Spanish and Argentine Civil Law Interpretation
Table of contents
Abstract Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The Category of Objects of Civil Rights in the Spanish and Argentine Civil Law Interpretation
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
DOI
10.61205/jzsp.2024.4.5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vyacheslav Kress 
Occupation: Chairman
Affiliation: Moscow District Arbitration Court
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 20 No. 4
Pages
92-101
Abstract

The subject of this study is the norms of Spanish and Argentine civil law on objects of civil rights, which are things (cosas), property (propiedad) and objects of the “patrimonio” category, which have no analogue in Russian civil legislation. A distinctive feature of Spanish law is an open list of limited proprietary rights. Russian legislation contains a legal category of objects of civil rights, the content of which in terms of the ratio of legal categories of things, property and property rights is extremely ambiguous, in addition, the nature of the fixed list of property rights (open or closed) is also the subject of discussion. The civil legislation of Argentina provides a way to define an object of the material world as an object of civil rights without specifically specifying the norms of current legislation. It seems that this method will significantly facilitate the emergence of new civil rights not provided for by law, for example, digital or virtual objects. Moreover, Russian private international law is characterized by the problem of distinguishing between real and binding statutes. In any case, the legal regime of a thing is largely determined by the law of its location. The assets of the Russian Federation (its subjects) located on the territory of Spain can represent both property and obligation rights, which directly affects the extension of the principle of jurisdictional immunity to them.

Keywords
objects of civil rights, things, property, property rights, rights of claim, property rights, conflict of laws, property statute, contractual statute, Spanish law, law of Argentina
Date of publication
29.08.2024
Number of purchasers
3
Views
40
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. All P. M., Albornoz J. R. La inmunidad de jurisdicción y de ejecución de los Estados extranjeros a la luz de la legislación y la jurisprudencia Argentina. Derecho del Comercio Internacional. Temas y actualidades, 2005, no. 4. 
2. Blanco A. E. Numerus clausus en materia de derechos reales: Alcances y efectos en los contratos. Derecho y Ciencias Sociales, 2019, vol. 20. 
3. Díez Soto C. M. Lecciones de introducción al derecho patrimonial. Cartagena, 2017. 
4. Goñi Rodríguez de Almeida M. Examen de la evolución jurisprudencial y doctrinal hacia la admisión de un numerus apertus en los derechosreales y su estrecha relación con el principio de especialidad. Revista Crítica de Derecho Inmobiliario, 2006, no. 693. 
5. Lucas Esteve A. Posesión, detentación y tenencia. La posesión en el Código Civil de Cataluña. Revista Crítica de Derecho Inmobiliario, 2016, no. 757. 
6. Menéndez S. F. Inmunidad de jurisdicción de los Estados. Caso “ARA Libertad”. Aequitas Virtual, 2017, vol. 11, no. 28. 
7. O’Callaghan Muñoz X. Compendio de Derecho civil. Vol. 3. Madrid, 2016. 
8. Puig Peña F. Tratado de derecho civil español. Vol. 1. Madrid, 1972. 
9. Rodríguez-Zapata Pérez J. Comentario al artículo 145. In: Alzaga O. (dir.). Comentarios a las leyes políticas. Madrid, 1988. Vol. 11. 
10. Santolaya Machetti P. Descentralización y cooperación. Madrid, 1984. 
11. Weber A. El principio de estado de derecho como principio constitucional común europeo. Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, 2008, no. 84. 
12. Berg L. A. International-legal characteristic of integration processes in northern Europe and their impact on national security of Russia. Voennoe pravo, 2022, no. 2(72), pp. 245—251. (In Russ.) 
13. V. V. Blazheev, M. A. Egorova (eds). Digital Law. Moscow, 2022. 640 p. (In Russ.) 
14. Vasyaev A. A. Advocacy in the human rights system of the Russian Federation: theory and practice. Dr. diss. Moscow, 2022. 516 p. (In Russ.) 
15. Vilkova N. G. Ownership in private international law of the Russian Federation. In: Greshnikov I. P. International commercial arbitration and private law issues. Moscow, 2015. Pp. 145—156. (In Russ.) 
16. Khabrieva T. Y. (ed.). Doctrinal Foundations of the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Moscow, 2023. 384 p. (In Russ.) 
17. Khabrieva T. Y. (ed.). Constitutions of African and Pacific States. Vol. 4. Moscow, 2021. 1040 p. (In Russ.) 
18. Naletov K. I. The Principle of Jurisdictional Immunity in Resolving Disputes in the Sphere of Production, Use and Turnover of Energy Resources. Ekonomika. Pravo. Obshchestvo, 2017, no. 2(10), pp. 61—70. (In Russ.) 
19. Kapustin A. Ya. (ed.). Modern concept of Interaction between International and Domestic Law. Moscow, 2023. 336 p. (In Russ.) 
20. Khabrieva T. Y., Kovler A. I. (eds). Modern Concepts of the Rule of Law and the Law-Governed State: a Comparative Legal Study. Moscow, 2024. 416 p. (In Russ.) 
21. Terekhova Yu. K. Commentary to Federal Law No. 297-FZ of November 3, 2015 “On Jurisdictional Immunities of a Foreign State and Property of a Foreign State in the Russian Federation” (article-by-article), 2016. Access from SPS “Consultant Plus”. (In Russ.) 
22. Fromm E. Escape from freedom Erich Fromm. Moscow, 1990. 251 p. (In Russ.) 
23. Gelli M. Constitución de la Nación Argentina: comentada y concordada. Buenos Aires, 2004.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate