Везде
Alternative Models of Constitutional Control
Table of contents
Abstract Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Alternative Models of Constitutional Control
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
DOI
10.61205/jzsp.2024.4.4
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Rovshan Ismailov 
Occupation: Cand. Sci. (Law), Judge of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Affiliation: Constitutional Court of the Republic of Azerbaijan, Baku, Azerbaijan
Edition
Volume 20 Issue 4
Pages
60-70
Abstract

The article analyzes models of constitutional control and criteria for their identification, t aking into account the experience of their evolution and the variety of characteristics at the present time. In addition to the existing basic control models (diffuse and centralized), it is also proposed in legal thought to identify alternative models and their classification criteria. This allows us to explore the problem of constitutional control without focusing on the dominant approach to the classification of models based on whether control is carried out by a specialized constitutional court or a court of general jurisdiction. The purpose of the study is to give an idea of the construction of constitutional control models without connection only with the identification of the main models, allowing one to analyze the classification criteria that reveal the goals that give constitutional control its raison d’etre. The research used the dialectical method of cognition, general scientific methods of systematicity, modeling, analysis and synthesis, as well as special legal methods — comparative legal, historical and legal, etc. Based on the results of the analysis, it was concluded that models of constitutional control are evolving, emphasizing the tendency of their convergence. In systems that were originally centralized, elements characteristic of the diffuse model can be applied; control, exercised only in the form of concrete verification of the constitutionality of normative acts, may over time be characterized by qualities inherent in abstract control.

Keywords
constitutional control, diffuse model, centralized (continental) model, convergence of systems, concrete and abstract constitutional control, a priori control, a posteriori control, control of the constitutionality of the law outside its application and in connection with the application of the law
Date of publication
29.08.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
14
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
2600 RUB / 0.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2024
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 800.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Abdullayev F. Legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Baku, 2013. (In Azerbaijani) 
2. Bickel A. The Least Dangerous Branch: the Supreme Court at the bar of politics. New Haven, 1986. 
3. Cappelletti M. Judicial review in the contemporary world. Indianapolis, 1971. 
4. Favoreu L. American and European Models of Constitutional Justice. Comparative and Private International Law: Essays in Honor of John Henry Merryman on his Seventieth Birthda. Ed. by D. S. Clark. Berlin, 1990. 
5. Favoreu L. Les Cours constitutionnelles. 3e éd. Paris, 1996. 
6. Favoreu L. Modèle européen et modèle américain de justice constitutionnelle. Annuaire International de Justice Constitutionnelle, 1988, vol. 4. Paris, 1990. 
7. Fernández Segado F. La justicia constitucional ante el siglo XXI: la progresiva convergencia de los sistemas americano y europeo-kelseniano. Córdoba, 2003. 
8. Fromont M. La justice constitutionnelle dans le monde. Paris, 1996. 
9. García Belaunde D. Derecho procesal constitucional. Trujillo, Universidad César Vallejo. 1998. 
10. Gardbaum S. Reassessing the new Commonwealth model of constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2010, vol. 8. 
11. Gardbaum S. The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism. American Journal of Comparative Law, 2001, vol. 49. 
12. Goldsworthy J. Homogenizing Constitutions. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 2003, vol. 23. 
13. Kavanagh A. The collaborative constitution. Cambridge, 2024. 
14. McWhinney E. Constitutionalism in Germany and the Federal Constitutional Court. Sythoff, Leiden, 1962. 
15. McWhinney E. Judicial Review in the English-Speaking World. Toronto, 1956. 
16. McWhinney E. Supreme Cours and Judicial Law-Making: Constitutional Tribunals and Constitutional Review. Dordrecht, 1986. 
17. Pfersmann O. Classifications organocentriques et classifications normocentriques de la justice constitutionnelle en droit compar. In: Andersen R., Déom D., Leurquin-De Visscher F. et al. En hommage à Francis Delpérée — Itinéraires d’un constitutionnaliste. Bruxelles; Paris, 2007. 
18. Pizzorusso A. Garanzie costituzionali. Art. 134. In: Branca G. (cur.). Commentario della Costituzione. Bologna-Roma, 1981. 
19. Pizzorusso A. I sistemi di giustizia costituzionale: dai modelli alla prassi. Quaderni costituzionali, 1982, no. 3. 
20. Roach K. The Supreme Court on trial: judicial activism or democratic dialogue. Toronto, 2001. 
21. Rubio Llorente F. Tendances actuelles de la juridiction constitutionnelle en Europe. Annuaire International de Justice Constitutionnelle, 1996, vol. 12. Paris, 1997. 
22. Ruggeri A., Spadaro A. Lineamenti di giustizia costituzionale. Torino, 2004. 
23. Saunders C. The interesting times of Louis Favoreu. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 2007, vol. 5. 
24. Tushnet M. Alternative Forms of Judicial Review. Michigan Law Review, 2003, vol. 101. 
25. Von Brünneck A. Le contrôle de constitutionnalité et le législateur dans les démocraties occidentales. Annuaire International de Justice Constitutionnelle, 1988, vol. 4. Paris, 1990. P. 
26. Weber A. Notes sur la Justice constitutionnelle comparée: Convergences et divergences. Annuaire International de Justice Constitutionnelle, 2003, vol. 19. Paris, 2004. 
27. Weill R. Hybrid Constitutionalism: The Israeli Case for Judicial Review and Why We Should Care. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 2012, vol. 30. 
28. Vinogradova E. V., Danilevskaya I. L. Amendments of 2020 to the Constitution of the Russian Federation. Constitutional control “ex ante” as an institution of domestic and foreign constitutionalism. State and Law, 2020, no. 5, pp. 7—18. (In Russ.) 
29. Vitruk N. V. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie. Sudebno-konstitutsionnoe pravo i protsess. Moscow, 2010. 
30. Garadzhaev D. Constitutional Court of the Republic of Azerbaijan: Theory and Practice. Odessa, 2016. (In Russ.) 
31. Kaynov V. I., Safarov R. A. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie. Sudebno-konstitutsionnoe pravo i protsess. Moscow, 2015. 
32. Vasilevich G. A. (ed.). Constitutional justice. Minsk, 2019. 367 p. (In Russ.) 
33. Miryasheva E. V., Pavlikov S. G., Safonov V. E. Sudebnyy konstitutsionnyy kontrol’ v Rossii i zarubezhnykh stranakh: istoriya i sovremennost’. Moscow, 2015. 
34. Myrzalimov R. M. Organy konstitutsionnoy yustitsii v stranakh Tsentral’noy Azii: problemy teorii i praktiki. Dr. diss. thesis. Moscow, 2013. 
35. Ostapovich I. Yu. Konstitutsionnyy sovet Respubliki Kazakhstan: voprosy teorii i praktiki. Ust’-Kamenogorsk, 2015. 
36. Saidov A.Kh. Comparative law. Tashkent, 1999. (In Russ.) 
37. Slesareva K. A. Konstitutsionnaya yustitsiya gosudarstv — chlenov Sodruzhestva nezavisimykh gosudarstv: sravnitel’nopravovoe issledovanie. Cand. diss. Tyumen’, 2016. 
38. Kovler A. I., Chirkin V. E., Yudin Yu.A. (eds). Comparative constitutional law. Moscow, 1996. (In Russ.) 
39. Yudin Yu. A., Shulzhenko Yu. L. Konstitutsionnoe pravosudie v federativnom gosudarstve (sravnitel’no-pravovoe issledovanie). Moscow, 2000. 
40. Young A. Democratic dialogue and the constitution. Oxford, 2017. 
41. Nesmeyanova S. E. Konstitutsionnyy sudebnyy protsess. Moscow, 2020.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate