Везде
On Opportunities of Comparative Judicial Law
Table of contents
Abstract Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
On Opportunities of Comparative Judicial Law
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
DOI
10.61205/S199132220029819-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Evgeniy Fokin 
ORCID: 0000-0002-1121-6830
Occupation: Senior Researcher, Center of International Law and Comparative Legal Studies
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Volume 20 No. 2
Pages
14-27
Abstract

The subject of this study is to determine the opportunities for using the comparative legal method in judicial law. The article is divided into two parts. In the first, the author attempts to concretize the concept of “judicial law” and substantiate his vision of this concept. The second one examines promising areas of using the comparative legal method in the study of issues of judiciary and the organization of justice.

The author proceeds from a rather limited subject of judicial law as a scientific field. It includes fundamental issues of the development of judicial institutions and the organization of justice. At the same time, the idea of the unity of the process, which is associated with the historical emergence of the judicial law concept, is considered by the author as no longer relevant. However, the theses put forward by Russian scientists on judicial and organizational legal relations that develop outside the procedural law, but are directly related to the administration of justice, have a significant perspective.

The article shows that the use of the comparative method in judicial law is objectively necessary and allows us to identify general patterns of development of judicial systems, the most promising approaches to regulating judicial and organizational relations and to determine the possibilities of using foreign experience in the development of national judicial institutions. For Russia at the present stage, the analysis of the practice of international courts (primarily the European Court of Human Rights) in cases of violation by foreign states of the right to a fair trial of specific applicants is of particular relevance.

Keywords
judicial law, comparative law, judicial power, organization of justice, judicial and organizational relations
Date of publication
19.04.2024
Number of purchasers
3
Views
63
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Banasik P., Morawska S. The Courts Public Image — the Desired Direction of Change. International Journal for Court Administration, 2016, no. 8(1). 
2. Cappelletti M. The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective. Oxford; New York, 1989. 
3. Zuckermann A. S. et al. (eds). Civil Justice in Crisis: Comparative Perspectives of Civil Procedure. Oxford; New York, 1999. 
4. Dodson S. The Challenge of Comparative Civil Procedure. Alabama Law Review, 2009, vol. 60, iss. 1. 
5. Gottwald P. Civil Procedure Reform in Germany. American Journal of Comparative Law, 1997, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 17—34. 
6. Roberts A., Stephan P. B., Verdier P.-H., Versteeg M. (eds). Comparative International law. Oxford, 2018. 139 p. 
7. Zekoll J. Comparative Civil Procedure. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Ed. by M. Reimann, R. Zimmermann. 2nd ed. Oxford, 2019. 
8. Argunov A. V. Prostranstvo pravosudiya. Moscow, 2021.
9. Berestnev Yu. Yu. Jurisdictional conflict between the Polish authorities and the European judiciary. Byulleten’ Evropeyskogo suda po pravam cheloveka, 2022, no. 1, pp. 154—159. (In Russ.) 
10. Branovitskiy K. L., Rents I. G., Yarkov V. V. Judicial rule-makingin the context of coronavirus pandemic: absurdity or necessity? Zakon, 2020, no. 5, pp. 107—117. (In Russ.) 
11. Bushtets N. V. Organizatsiya deyatel’nosti suda s uchastiem prisyazhnykh zasedateley. Cand. diss. Moscow, 2022. 
12. Khabrieva T. Y. (ed.). Venice Commission on the problems of justice in the modern world. Moscow, 2018. 456 p. (In Russ.) 
13. Gadjiev Kh. I. Convergence of Legal Systems: the Role of International Justice. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 119—134. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.088. 
14. Gadzhiev Kh. I. Sudebnoe pravo kak otrazhenie zakonomernosti razvitiya pravosudiya. In: Blokhin P. D., Il’in A. V., Tyutin D. V. (eds). ARS IURIS. Moscow, 2023. 
15. Galperin M. L. Politicising law or legalising politics? Justiciability and the “political question” on the examples from international justice. International Justice, 2020, no. 4, pp. 45—58. (In Russ.) 
16. Davtyan A. G. German civil procedure law. Moscow, 2000. (In Russ.) 
17. Demin A. A. The issue of administrative justice courts is not cancelled. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess, 2020, no. 8, pp. 35— 39. (In Russ.) 
18. Dyachenko E. B. Otpravlenie pravosudiya v sudakh integratsionnykh ob”edineniy. Dr. diss. Moscow, 2023. 
19. Dyachenko E. B., Myslivskiy P. P., Neshataeva T. N. Evraziyskaya integratsiya: rol’ Suda. Ed. by T. N. Neshataeva. Moscow, 2015. 
20. Kovler A. I. Anthropology of Human Rights in the Digital Age (the Essay of the Comparative Legal Method). Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 5—29. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.125. 
21. Khabrieva T. Y. (ed.). Chronicle of Russian Legal Science. Vol. 3. Moscow, 2023. 304 p. (In Russ.). 
22. Kovler A. I. Perspektivy uchrezhdeniya Suda SNG (Suda EAES) po pravam cheloveka. Prava cheloveka. Praktika Evropeyskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka, 2022, no. 7, pp. 3—5. 
23. Kovler A. I. Law in the Grip of Politics (on Some Trends in the Practice of International Courts). Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2023, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 78—90. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jzsp.2023.024. 
24. Kovler A. I., Kosheleva E. V. Comparative Legal Method in the Acts of the Venice Commission. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2022, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 102—112. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2022.053. 
25. Kuznetsova I. S. Quasi-judicial removal procedures of judges in Russia and the United States of America. Comparative Constitutional Review, 2022, no. 2(147), pp. 88—104. (In Russ.) 
26. Kuchina M. S. Specialized courts: foreign experience and perspectives of development in Russia. Rossiyskiy sledovatel’, 2017, no. 13, pp. 53—56. (In Russ.) 
27. Lazarev V. V., Gadjiev Kh. I. Main Sources (Forms) of Judicial Law. Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 5—22. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2022.091. 
28. Marchenko M. N. Comparative Law. Moscow, 2015. (In Russ.) 
29. Mokhov A. A. (ed.). Medical Law. Moscow, 2017. (In Russ.) 
30. Mikhaylova E. V. Notarial law as an independent branch of the Russian law. Notarius, 2023, no. 3, pp. 12—16. (In Russ.) 
31. Mikhaylovskiy I. V. Sudebnoe pravo kak samostoyatel’naya yuridicheskaya nauka. Pravo, 1908, no. 32. 
32. Muradyan E. M. Sudebnoe pravo (v kontekste trekh protsessual’nykh kodeksov). Moscow, 2003. 
33. Nagiev R. S., Nekhaychik V. K. Process unity as a principle of the formation of modern administrative and procedural law. Obrazovanie i pravo, 2020, no. 8, pp. 136—140. (In Russ.) 
34. Osminin B. I. International Law, Foreign Relations Law and a Conception “Comparative International Law”. Journal of Russian Law, 2021, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 145—159. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2021.025. 
35. Polyanskiy N. N. Issues of the theory of the Soviet criminal process. Moscow, 1956. (In Russ.) 
36. Polyanskiy N. N., Strogovich M. S., Savitskiy V. M., Mel’nikov A. A. Problemy sudebnogo prava. Moscow, 1983. 
37. Khabrieva T. Y., Lebedev V. M. (eds). Justice in the Modern World. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2017. 784 p. (In Russ.) 
38. Puchinskiy V. K. The civil procedure of foreign countries. Moscow, 2008. (In Russ.) 
39. Ryazanovskiy V. A. Edinstvo protsessa. Moscow, 1996. 
40. Saidov A. Kh., Tumanov V. A. Comparative Law. Moscow, 2003. (In Russ.) 
41. Khabrieva T. Y., Kovler A. I. (eds). Modern Concepts of the Rule of Law and the Law-Governed State: a Comparative Legal Study. Moscow, 2024. 416 p. (In Russ.) 
42. Sokolov T. V. Formy vzaimosvyazi konstitutsionnogo i ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstv v kontekste doktriny sudebnogo prava. Cand. diss. St. Petersburg, 2014. 
43. Strogovich M. S. O sisteme nauki sudebnogo prava. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo, 1939, no. 3, pp. 55—70. 
44. Tikhomirov Yu. A. The course of comparative law. Moscow, 1996. (In Russ.) 
45. Tumanov V. A. On the development of comparative law. In: Tumanov V. A. Favourites. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.) 
46. Fokin E. A. Dostupnost’ pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom protsesse: teoreticheskie osnovy i prakticheskaya realizatsiya. Moscow, 2023.
47. Fokin E. A. Comparative Civil Procedure: Subject, Aims and Prospects. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2018, no. 3, pp. 152—160. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art.2018.3.21. 
48. Fokin E. A. Evolution of the Venice Commission’s Legal Positions on the Independence of the Judiciary. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2022, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 95—106. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2022.039. 
49. Chirkin V. E. Comparative Law. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2023. (In Russ.) 
50. Yalilov A. D. On the creation of specialized courts in the field of construction: comparative legal aspect. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2023, no. 2, pp. 273—298. (In Russ.) 
51. Eliseev N. G. Civil procedure law of foreign countries. 2nd ed. Moscow, 2004. (In Russ.) 
52. Blazheev V. V., Egorova M. A. (eds). Digital Law. Moscow, 2020. (In Russ.) 
53. Reshetnikova I. V. Evidentiary law of England and the USA. Ekaterinburg, 1997. (In Russ.) 
54. Sokolov T. V. Unification of Russian procedural law and restoration of the concept of judicial law. Education and Law, 2020, no. 10, pp. 186—194. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate