The Legal Status of the Crimean Region as Part of the Ukrainian SSR: A Return to the Problem
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The Legal Status of the Crimean Region as Part of the Ukrainian SSR: A Return to the Problem
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ilya Bondarchuk 
Occupation: Associate Professor, Department of the State and Legal Disciplines
Affiliation: Crimean Branch, Russian State University of Justice
Address: Simferopol, Russia
Edition
Pages
85-94
Abstract

The article examines an atypical situation generated by the implementation of the USSR Law of April 26, 1954 “On the transfer of the Crimean region from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian SSR”. It has been established that the illegal transfer of Crimea to Ukraine, which took place in accordance with this Law, is still the basis for non-recognition by some foreign countries of the reunification of Crimea and Russia, for the establishment of illegal sanctions and manifestations of discrimination that create difficulties and inconveniences for the lives of the population of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol. This aspect, in the author’s opinion, is the basis for raising the question of replacing the original meaning of the USSR Law of 1954, as well as the formation of unplanned legal consequences by the Soviet legislator that occurred during its implementation and the subsequent period of “experiencing the law” in modern conditions.

The purpose of the study is to determine the legal prospects for overcoming the distortion of the meaning of the USSR Law on the transfer of the Crimean region of the Ukrainian SSR in 1954 in the current constitutional realities. The historical conditions of the adoption of the said Law, as well as its legal consequences at the present stage, are investigated, and the practice of evaluation by state bodies of foreign countries containing discriminatory provisions regarding the fact of the reunification of Crimea and Russia is analyzed.

Using comparative legal and systemic methods, the prospects of challenging the 1954 USSR Law in the constitutional order as the most successful and acceptable from the point of view of the positive influence of constitutional courts on the general integration processes in federal states are revealed.

The basic conclusion of this study consists not only in the unrealization of the goals of the Soviet legislator when adopting the USSR Law of 1954, but also in the occurrence of unplanned consequences in the form of the stay of Crimea and its population within the framework of the state created on the basis of the exercise by the Ukrainian nation of the right to self-determination.

Keywords
transfer of Crimea, Ukrainian SSR, interpolation of law, 1954, retroactive assessment of the law
Date of publication
26.02.2024
Number of purchasers
6
Views
77
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf
1

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Alekseev S. S. Problems of the Theory of Law: Lecture course. Sverdlovsk, 1973. Vol. 2. 401 p. (In Russ.)
2. Andrichenko L. V., Plyugina I. V. Migration Legislation of the Russian Federation: Development Trends and Practice of Application. Moscow, 2019. 392 p. (In Russ.)
3. Bondarchuk I. V. Constitutional and Legislation of the Republic of Crimea (2014—2018): from Problems of Integration to Sustainable Development. Journal of Russian Law, 2019, no. 1, pp. 142—149. (In Russ.)
4. Bondarchuk I. V. Rule-making policy of the Republic of Crimea in the conditions of change of constitutional cycles. RUDN Journal of Law, 2019, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 80—101. (In Russ.)
5. Zlatopolsky D. L. USSR — federal state. Moscow, 1967. 335 p. (In Russ.)
6. Kozlov T. Legal Decisions of 1954 on the Transfer of Crimea to the Ukrainian SSR and the problem of International Recognition of Crimea’s Joining to Russia. Perspectives and prospects. E-journal, 2019, no. 2(18), pp. 22—28. (In Russ.)
7. Kremnev P. P. The Concept of “Crimean Law” and the Doctrine of International Law in Relation to the Secession of Crimea from Ukraine (Tomsinov V. A. “Crimean Law” or Legal Basis for the Reunification of the Crimea and Russia). Moscow University Bulletin, Series 11: Law, 2015, no. 3, pp. 143—148. (In Russ.)
8. Lepeshkin A. I. Soviet federalism: (Theory and Practice). Moscow, 1977. 319 p. (In Russ.)
9. Pashentsev D. A. Legal Basis for the Management of Outlying Areas and Acceding Territories in the Context of the Expansion of the Russian State: Historical Retrospective. Federal State: historical and legal experience and modern practices (to the 100th anniversary of the formation of the USSR): mater. Intern. sci.-pract. conf., Omsk, October 20—22, 2022. Omsk, 2022. pp. 251-255. (In Russ.)
10. Tomsinov V. A. “Crimean Law” or Legal Basis for the Reunification of the Crimea and Russia. Moscow, 2017. 132 p. (In Russ.)
11. Khabrieva T. Y., Lafitsky V. I. Comments on the Draft Conclusion of the Venice Commission on “Whether the Decision Taken by the Supreme Council of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea in Ukraine to Organize a Referendum on Becoming a Constituent Territory of the Russian Federation or Restoring Crimea’s 1992 Constitution is Compatible with Constitutional Principles”. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2014, no. 1(44), pp. 129—135. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate