Перспективы европейской модели конституционного контроля
Перспективы европейской модели конституционного контроля
Библиография
Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы
1. Amaral M. L., Pereira R. A. The Portuguese Constitutional Court // The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law. Vol. 3: Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Oxford, 2020. 2. Brewer-Carías A. R. Judicial Review in Comparative Law. Cambridge, 1989 // Brewer-Carías A. R. Judicial Review. Comparative Constitutional Law Essays, Lectures and Courses (1985—2011). Caracas, 2014. 3. Butt S. Indonesia̓s Constitutional Court and Indonesia̓s Electoral Systems // Constitutional Courts in Asia: a Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, 2018. 4. Calamandrei P. La illegittimità costituzionale delle leggi nel processo civile. Padova, 1950 // Calamandrei P. Opere Giuridiche. Vol. III. Diritto e processo costituzionale. Roma, 2019. 5. Castañeda Anna Leah Fidelis T. The Origins of Philippine Judicial Review: 1900—1935 // Ateneo Law Journal. 2001. Vol. 46. 6. Chaihark Hahm. Constitutional Court of Korea: Guardian of the Constitution or Mouthpiece of the Government? // Constitutional Courts in Asia: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, 2018. 7. De Visser M. Constitutional Review in Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford, 2014. 8. Ferrer Mac-Gregor E. Panorámica del derecho procesal constitucional y convencional. Madrid, 2017. 9. Fromont M. La diversité de la justice constitutionnelle en Europe // Anuario iberoamericano de justicia constitucional. 2005. No. 9. 10. Guillen Lopez E. Judicial Review in Spain: The Constitutional Court // Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. 2008. Vol. 41. 11. Iris Nguyên Duy. New Trends in Scandinavian Constitutional Review // Scandinavian Studies in Law. 2015. Vol. 61. 12. Jestaedt M. The Constitution Conformant Interpretation — Norm Compatibilisation Through Harmonisation by Way of Interpretation // Relationship between the Legislature and the Judiciary: Contributions to the 6th Seoul-Freiburg Law Faculties Symposium. Baden-Baden, 2017. 13. Jestaedt M. The Karlsruhe Phenomenon: What Makes the Court What It Is // The German Federal Constitutional Court: The Court Without Limits. Oxford, 2020. 14. Kaidatzis A. Greeceʼs Third Way in Prof. Tushnetʼs Distinction between Strong-Form and Weak-Form Judicial Review, and What We May Learn from It // Jus Politicum. 2014. No. 13. 15. Kelsen H. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, 1949. 16. Kommers D., Miller R. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Durham, 2012. 17. Lamarque E. Interpreting Statutes in Conformity with the Constitution: The Role of the Constitutional Court and Ordinary Judges // Italian Journal of Public Law. 2010. Vol. 2. Iss. 1. 18. Maik M. Constitutional review of foreign law in English and German courts — A comparative study // Oxford University Comparative Law Forum 5. 2002. URL: https://ouclf.law.ox.ac.uk/constitutional-review-of-foreign-law-in-english-and-german-courtsa- comparative-study/. 19. Möschel M. Diffuse Constitutionality Review in Germany // Constitutionalism Under Stress. Essays in Honour of Wojciech Sadurski. Oxford, 2020. 20. OʼBrien F. W. Judicial Review in Ireland // Saint Louis University Public Law Review. 1990. Vol. 9. Iss. 2. 21. Requejo Pagés Juan Luis. The Spanish Constitutional Tribunal // The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law. Vol. 3: Constitutional Adjudication: Institutions. Oxford, 2020. 22. Schlaich K., Korioth S. Das Bundesverfassungsgericht — Stellung, Verfahren, Entscheidungen. 7th ed. München, 2007. 23. Söhn H. Die abstrakte Normenkontrolle // Bundesverfassungsgericht und Grundgesetz (Festgabe aus Anlass des 25-jährigen Bestehens des Bundesverfassungsgerichts / C. Starck, M. Drath (hrsg.). Erster Band (Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit). Tübingen, 1976. 24. Yasuo Hasebe. Supreme Court of Japan: A Judicial Court, Not Necessarily a Constitutional Court // Constitutional Courts in Asia: A Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, 2018. 25. Кокотова М. А. Государственный совет Франции как орган конституционного контроля // Актуальные проблемы российского права. 2014. № 6. 26. Павликов С. Г. Организация и деятельность местных судов: российский и зарубежный опыт. М., 2005. 27. Vinx L. Hans Kelsen̓s pure theory of law: legality and legitimacy. Oxford, 2007.
Комментарии
Сообщения не найдены