Evolution in the BRICS Era under the Legal Enlightenment in a Multipolar World: Navigating the Shift from Unipolar Legal Dominance to Diverse Legal Systems and Anti-Corruption Efforts
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Evolution in the BRICS Era under the Legal Enlightenment in a Multipolar World: Navigating the Shift from Unipolar Legal Dominance to Diverse Legal Systems and Anti-Corruption Efforts
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Cássius Guimarães Chai 
Occupation: State Criminal Prosecutor; Full Law Professor (PPGDIR), Professor of Geopolitics (PPGAERO), Federal University of Maranhão
Affiliation: Federal University of Maranhão, Sao Luis, Brazil
Alberth Rodolfo Ferreira Viana
Occupation: Law Researcher Assistant, UFMA
Affiliation: Federal University of Maranhão, Sao Luis, Brazil
Pages
16-23
Abstract

This article meticulously dissects the legal development unfolding in a multipolar world, examining the shift from unipolar legal control to diverse systems and spotlighting the state’s anti-corruption efforts. It critically reviews the progress of the BRICS in this new global dynamic, highlighting the formidable challenges they’ve faced and the strategies they’ve proposed to assess the effectiveness of their actions. The study reveals that the transition from a unipolar to a multipolar order is a double-edged sword. It zeroes in on three pivotal areas: anti-corruption efforts, the uniformity of law enforcement, and legal correspondence between nations. These areas serve as a compass to navigate the global fight against corruption. To effectively implement anti-corruption strategies in a multipolar world, a united and collaborative effort is indispensable, given the diverse legal systems, political landscapes, and the intricacies of globalization. Moreover, by prioritizing the systematic and collaborative utilization of technology, transparency, and accountability, both BRICS and other blocs can contribute to fostering a participatory and just society that is more resilient to corruption.

Keywords
multipolar world, BRICS, anti-corruption efforts
Date of publication
29.08.2024
Number of purchasers
0
Views
43
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2024

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Cameron S. D. Brown. Investigating and prosecuting cyber crime: Forensic dependencies and barriers to justice. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2015, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 55—119. 
2. Mohammad A. et al. Anti-corruption mechanisms: a study in the light of international law and national regulation. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 2022, vol. 11, iss. 4, pp. 224—236. 
3. Bello y Villarino J-M. International Anticorruption Law, Revisited. Harvard International Law Journal, 2022, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 343—399. 
4. Martins H. H.T. S. Metodologia Qualitativa de Pesquisa. Educação e Pesquisa, 2004, vol. 30, no. 2. 
5. Migueles C. Pesquisa: Por que administradores precisam entender disso? Rio de Janeiro, 2004. 
6. Gustin Miracy Barbosa de Sousa. (Re)Pensando a Pesquisa Jurídica: Teoria e Prática. 3rd ed. Belo Horizonte, 2010. 
7. Palmer V. V. Mixed Legal Systems... and the Myth of Pure Laws. Louisiana Law Review, 2007, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1205—1218. 
8. Khabrieva T. Y. (ed.). Legal Regulation of Combating Corruption in China. Мoscow, 2018. 280 p. (In Russ.). 
9. Sandoval-Ballesteros I. From “institutional” to “structural” corruption: Rethinking accountability in a world of public-private partnerships. Edmond J. Safra Working Papers, No. 33. December 20, 2013. 
10. Markus Funk T. Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties and Letters Rogatory: A Guide for Judges. Federal Judicial Center, 2014. 
11. McArthur K. S., O’Shea A., Chalos O. G. Practical Considerations for Achieving Global Resolutions in Cross-Border Investigations. Latin Lawyer, 5 Jan. 2024. Available at: https://latinlawyer.com/guide/the-guide-corporate-crisis-management/fifthedition/ article/practical-considerations-achieving-global-resolutions-in-cross-border-investigations (accessed 21.03.2024). 
12. Rahman K. Select anti-corruption success stories. 28.03.2022. Available at: file:///C:/Users/Red2/Downloads/Select-Anticorruption- Success-Stories_U4-reviewed_PR.pdf (accessed 05.04.2024). 
13. Decker K. Justice System. In: Enhancing Government Effectiveness and Transparency: The Fight Against Corruption. Global Report. September 2020. Pp. 316—331. Available at: https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/235541600116631094/pdf/Enhancing- Government-Effectiveness-and-Transparency-The-Fight-Against-Corruption.pdf (accessed 22.03.2024). 
14. Fjeldstad O.-H., Isaksen J. Anti-Corruption Reforms: Challenges, Effects and Limits of World Bank Support. Washington, 2008. 78 p. Available at: https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/3134-anti-corruption-reforms-challenges.pdf (accessed 20.03.2024). 
15. Pyman M. et al. Analyzing the anti-corruption approaches of the 26 top-ranked countries: An opportunity for a new generation of strategies. London, 2018. 48 p. Available at: https://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/-/media/files/nrf/nrfweb/ imported/countries-curbing-corruption---top-26-report.pdf?la=en&revision=cd44489d-caee-4db9-b7e3-c150da13106d (accessed 09.04.2024). 
16. Chai C. G., da Costa F. C. Strengthening the BRICS Anti-Corruption Framework through Technology and International Cooperation. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2023, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 18—29. DOI: 10.61205/jzsp.2023.046. 
17. Chai C. G. The Brazilian Legal Framework in the Inter-linkages Between Terrorism and Organized Crime. Beijing, 2018. 17 p. 
18. Khabrieva T. Y. (ed.). Combating Corruption: New Challenges. Мoscow, 2016. 376 p. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/21335. 
19. Da Costa F. C. et al. Enhancing Good Governance and Combating Corruption in Brazil: Assessing the Feasibility, Potential, and Limitations of New Technologies. Beijing Law Review, 2023, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1484—1503. DOI: 10.4236/blr.2023.143080.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate