Paradigms of Comparative Law Development: From Problems of General Methodology to Issues of Private Law
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Paradigms of Comparative Law Development: From Problems of General Methodology to Issues of Private Law
Abstract
PII
S1991-32220000622-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Sergey Sinitsyn 
Occupation: Chief Researcher, Center of Private Law
Affiliation: Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
Address: Moscow, Russia
Edition
Pages
8-22
Abstract

The authors of legal research and drafters of legislation constantly turn to and actively use foreign experience; law schools offer special and basic courses in comparative law. However, legal theory and methodology of law, not to mention industry developments, practically do not address the substantive specifics of comparative law as a branch of knowledge, its methodology, limitations and possibilities of application. This article is dedicated to this scientific issue. In the evolutionary development of law, such phenomena as reception and legal transplantology and implantation are considered, the conditions for the application of comparative law are formulated and justified. Special attention is paid to the challenges and requests addressed to comparative law at the present stage of development of the state and law. The author’s formed picture of the understanding and presentation of comparative law made it possible to present the shortcomings and insufficient elaboration of individual stages of reform of Russian civil legislation with a focus on the experience of “developed legal orders”. The issues discussed in the article are important for practical application and the legislative process, academic training and research work of legal scholars.

Keywords
comparative law, methodology, methods, lawmaking, law enforcement, legal science, legal education
Date of publication
26.02.2024
Number of purchasers
8
Views
142
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf

Publication text not found

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Bach I. Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung. Göttingen, 2020. 
2. Bonilla Maldonado D., Michaels R., Zalamea P. (eds). Los derechos de la naturaleza: diálogos entre el derecho y las artes. In: Lorenz S., Kindler P., Dutta A. (hrsg.). Naturaleza y Sociedad. Desafíos Medioambientales, 2022, no. 4. 
3. Einhundert Jahre Institut für Rechtsvergleichung an der Universität München Kaufrecht und Kollisionsrecht von E. Rabel bis heute. Tübingen, 2018. 
4. Heiderhoff B. (hrsg.). EU Fundamental Rights and Private Law. Baden-Baden, 2016. 
5. Heun W., Lipp V. (hrsg.). Europäisierung des Rechts / Deutsch-Ungarisches Kolloquium Budapest 2007. Göttingen, 2008. 
6. Forster D. Zur Methode des Rechtsvergleichs in der Rechtswissenschaft. Special Issue: Legal Scholarly Responses in Comparison, 2018. 
7. Butler W. E., Kresin O. V., Shemschuchenko Iu. S. (eds). Foundations of Comparative Law. Methods and Typologies. London, 2011. 
8. Glendon M. A., Gordon M. W., Osakwe C. Comparative Legal Traditions. New York, 1994. 
9. Großfeld B. Macht und Ohnmacht der Rechtsvergleichung. Tübingen, 1984. 
10. Großfeld B. Probleme der Rechtsvergleichung im Verhältnis Vereinigte Staaten von Amerika — Deutschland. RabelsZ, 1975, Bd. 39, H. 1. 
11. Hailbronner K. Ziele und Methoden völkerrechtlich relevanter Rechtsvergleichung. ZaöRV, 1976, vol. 36. 
12. Junker A. Rechtsvergleichung als Grundlagenfach. Juristen Zeitung, 1994, Nr. 19, S. 921—928. 
13. Kieningerb E.-A. Kodifikationsidee und Europäisches Privatrecht. Rechtswissenschaft, 2012, H. 4. 
14. Kübler F. Rechtsvergleichung als Grundlagendisziplin der Rechtswissenschaft. Juristen Zeitung, 1977, Nr. 4. 
15. Lorenz S., Riehm T. Lehrbuch zum neuen Schuldrecht. München, 2001. 
16. Mansel H.-P. Rechtsvergleichung und europäische Rechtseinheit. Juristen Zeitung, 1991, Nr. 11. 
17. Markus T. Zur Rechtsvergleichung im nationalen und internationalen Umweltrecht. ZaöRV, 2020, Bd. 80, H. 2. 
18. Mattei U., Ruskola T., Gidi A. Schlesingerʼs Comparative Law. New York, 2009. 
19. Michaels R. Internationales Privatrecht als Rechtsvergleichung Die kollisionsrechtlich-vergleichende Methode. Historical Comparative Law and Comparative Legal History. Reinhard Zimmermann: zum 70. Geburtstag am 10. Oktober 2022 (Beiträge zum ausländischen und internationalen Privatrecht, 138). Tübingen, 2022. 
20. Neuenbäumer A. Ernst Zitelmann Die Begründung der Rechtsvergleichung als Wissenschaft. Regensburg, 2010. 
21. Pistor K., Keinan Y., West M. Evolution of Corporate Law and the Transplant Effect: Lessons from Six Countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 2003, vol. 18. 
22. Pistor K., Keinan Y., West M. Innovation in Corporate Law. Journal of Comparative Economics, 2003, vol. 31. 
23. Prieto C. Regards croises sur les principes du droit europeen du contrat et le droit fransais. Puam, 2003. 
24. Von Bar C., Clive E., Schulte-Nölke H. (eds). Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). Articles and Comments. Munich, 2009. 
25. Schmidt-Kessel M. (hrsg.). Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsvereinheitlichung. Tübingen, 2023. 
26. Rusch A. F. Methoden und Ziele der Rechtsvergleichung. Jusletter, 2006, Nr. 13. 
27. Salaymeh L., Michaels R. Decolonial Comparative Law: A Conceptual Beginning. Rabels Zeitschrift für ausländisches und internationales Privatrecht, 2022, Bd. 86, Nr. 1. 
28. Socher J. Farewell to the European Constitutional Tradition: The 2020 Russian Constitutional Amendments. ZaöRV, 2020, Bd. 80. 
29. Offermann K. H. (ed.). The Private Law Systems in the EU: Discrimination on Grounds of Nationality and the Need for a European Civil Code. Directorate General for Research European Parliament Working Paper. Luxembourg, 1999. 
30. Tschentscher A. Dialektische Rechtsvergleichung — Zur Methode der Komparistik im öffentlichen Recht. Juristen Zeitung, 2007, H. 17. 
31. Varul P., Kull I., Kõve V. Käerdi M., Puri T. Asjaõigusseadus I. Kommenteeritud väljaanne. Tallin, 2014, vol. I. 
32. Veigel J. Die funktionale Methode bei der Rechtsvergleichung. Juridica International, 2021, vol. 30. 
33. Zimmermann R. Die Europäisierung des Privatrechts und die Rechtsvergleichung. Berlin, 2005. 
34. Zimmermann R. (hrsg.). Zukunftsperspektiven der Rechtsvergleichung. Tübingen, 2016. 
35. Zweigert K., Kötz H. Einfüchrung in die Rechtsvergleichung. Tübingen, 1996. 
36. Bekhruz Kh. Introduction to Comparative Law. Odessa, 2002. (In Russ.) 
37. Vinogradov P. G. Roman law in medieval Europe. Moscow, 2009. (In Russ.) 
38. Egorov A. V. Legal family as an object of comparative law. Pravovedenie, 2005, no. 2. (In Russ.) 
39. Karamzin N. M. About Ancient and New Russia in its political and civil relation. In: Karamzin N. M. About Ancient and New Russia. Moscow, 2002. (In Russ.) 
40. Kerimov D. A. Methodology of law: subject, functions, problems of philosophy of law. Moscow, 2000. (In Russ.) 
41. Kovler A. I., Kosheleva E. V. Comparative Legal Method in the Acts of the Venice Commission. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2022, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 102—112. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2022.053. 
42. Krasavchikov O. A. Soviet science of civil law (concept, subject, composition and system). In: Krasavchikov O. A. Categories of the science of civil law. Selected works. Vol. 1. Moscow, 2005. (In Russ.) 
43. Lafitskiy V. I. Comparative law in images of law. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.) 
44. Lundmark T. Essays on Comparative Law. St. Petersburg, 2022. (In Russ.) 
45. Marchenko M. N. Comparative law: textbook. Moscow, 2011. (In Russ.) 
46. Tikhomirov Yu. A. (ed.). Methodology of comparative law: materials of a scientific conference (Moscow, October 5, 2011). Moscow, 2012. (In Russ.) 
47. Sadikov O. N. Responsibility of the entrepreneur for losses. Application of model rules of European private law. In: Yakovlev V. F. (ed.). Commentary on the practice of considering economic disputes (judicial and arbitration practice). Moscow, 2016. Iss. 22. (In Russ.) 
48. Saidov A. Kh. Comparative law: textbook. Moscow, 2020. (In Russ.) 
49. Sinitsyn S. A. Actio in rem actio in personam: historical foundations, methods of interpolation and extrapolation of modern science of civil law. Moscow, 2013. (In Russ.) 
50. Tille A. A., Shvekov G. V. Comparative method in legal disciplines. Moscow, 1973. (In Russ.) 
51. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Criteria for comparative legal analysis of national states. In: Tikhomirov Yu. A. (ed.). Methodology of comparative law: materials of a scientific conference (Moscow, October 5, 2011). Moscow, 2012. (In Russ.) 
52. Tomsinov V. A. On the essence of the phenomenon called “reception of Roman law”. In: Vinogradov P. G. Essays on the theory of law. Roman law in medieval Europe. Ed. by W. E. Butler, V. A. Tomsinov. Moscow, 2010. (In Russ.) 
53. Tumanov A. V. On the development of comparative law. In: Tumanov V. A. Favorites. Moscow, 2008. (In Russ.) 
54. Khabrieva T. Y. Constitutional Reform in Today’s Context. Moscow, 2016. 320 p. (In Russ.) 
55. Tsvaygert K., Ketts Kh. International private law and comparative law. Moscow, 2001. (In Russ.) 
56. Mikheeva L. Yu. (ed.). Private law in the countries of the former USSR. Results of the 30th anniversary. Moscow, 2022. (In Russ.) 
57. Chirkin V. E. Comparative law. Moscow, 2017. (In Russ.) 
58. Shershenevich G. F. Science of civil law in Russia. Moscow, 2003. (In Russ.)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate